Well, time certainly flies when you’re busy and before you know it, it’s been almost a month since you’ve last written a blog post. At least that’s what has just happened to me! I’ve been busy doing research on fossil whales, fossil penguins, talking fossil penguins at Museum Victoria’s latest SmartBar, giving a talk on Australian fossil seabirds as well as preparing and submitting abstracts for an upcoming conference, whew! But I haven’t been blogging and bringing you, dear readers, new and cool fossil discoveries. So let’s rectify that situation then shall we?
As you may have guessed from the title above, this post is about fossil dugongs, or more precisely, the lack of them in the Indopacific region. Whilst today the region is the centre of sirenian abundance and fossils are known from areas such as Madagascar, Somalia, India, Sri Lanka and Indonesia, fossil evidence from the Indopacific has been lacking with the only reported finds being a partial mandible from the Pliocene of South Australia, a partial rib from the Miocene-Pliocene boundary of Victoria and fossils of the extant Dugong dugon from the Quaternary of Papua New Guinea and Holocene of southeast Australia. There is no clear explanation for the scarcity of dugong fossils in the Indopacific region as the find from South Australia shows they were present in the area in the past. Furthermore, there are plenty of available outcrops of sediments of the correct age, the sediments also indicate the climate would have been suitable for dugongs to be present and the high densities of sirenian bones make them favourable for preservation. Therefore any new finds would be crucial to gaining a more detailed understanding of sirenian evolution in the Indopacific.
One such find was made but it was actually 30 years ago, with the fossils not being studied until only recently and published in the Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology this July by Erich Fitzgerald (who also happens to be one of my PhD supervisors) and colleagues from the Smithsonian, Howard University College of Medicine and Flinders University. The recovery of the fossils (consisting of three posterior vertebrae, one anterior caudal vertebra and seven partial ribs) is a story in itself. The fossils were found in a cave in the remote Hindenburg Range of the New Guinea Highlands, Papua New Guinea, but when the fossils were being recovered the cave suddenly flooded meaning the crew had to make a quick exit leaving some fossil material behind!
The fossils date to between 11.8–17.5 Ma, giving a minimum age of just before 12 Ma for sirenians being present in Australasian coastal marine ecosystems, and by implication their primary food source: seagrasses. As Dr. Fitzgerald explains, “Modern-day dugongs are major consumers of sea-grass, and, by doing so, have a tremendous impact on the structure of the ecosystem,” said Dr Fitzgerald. “They participate in a delicate balancing act: their feeding allows diversity in sea-grass and animal species that would otherwise be lacking. Previously, it was thought that sea cows were fairly new arrivals in Australasia, and that their relationship with sea-grass ecosystems here was a recent event. This new evidence suggests sea cows have been an important component of Australasia’s marine ecosystems for at least 12 million years and that their role in the long-term health of these environments may be substantial.”
So whilst we are still in the dark about an awful lot of the history of sirenians in Australasia, this new find does shed a little light their evolution and now we know that they were there around 12 Ma, researchers can start looking in shallow marine sediments of similar age to find the next illuminating discovery.
Dr. Fitzgerald’s comments are taken from the Museum Victoria media release.
Erich M. G. Fitzgerald, Jorge Velez-Juarbe & Roderick T. Wells (2013) Miocene sea cow (Sirenia) from Papua New Guinea sheds light on sirenian evolution in the Indo-Pacific. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 33: 956–963.
How long can you hold your breath underwater? I’ll wager it wouldn’t be for much longer than a minute or two at most. The world record for a human is an astonishing 22.3 minutes set by Tom Sietas in June 2012 (link here). He did accomplish this with the aid of breathing pure oxygen for 30 minutes beforehand. The record without any aid is still an amazing 11.5 minutes. These extreme examples aside, the majority of the world’s population would struggle to achieve anything over two minutes. However, not all our mammalian cousins are as inept at staying submerged as us humans, especially those lineages that have returned the sea, such as the cetaceans (whales and dolphins), pinnipeds (seals) and sirenians (dugongs and manatees). These animals have evolved to be able stay underwater for much longer periods of time, with the longest dives undertaken by the northern elephant seal and the sperm whale, both of whom can dive for over an hour on a single breath! Marine mammals have evolved a whole suite of anatomical and physiological adaptations to enable themselves to undertake these long dives but key to their underwater exertions is the increased ability to store oxygen in their muscle tissues.
The protein molecule that allows mammals to store oxygen in their muscle tissues is known as myoglobin (in your blood oxygen is carried by haemoglobin). You can tell when this respiratory pigment is present in tissue as it gives it its red colour and, as any of you who have dissected a whale, dolphin or some other marine mammal will know, the elevated concentrations in their tissues cause their tissues to be very dark, even almost black in colour. Myoglobin is one of the best known and studied proteins but researchers were still unsure how marine mammals could use myoglobin in such high concentrations as it tends to clump and stick together when present in large amounts, therefore obviously making it difficult for it to be able to store oxygen in the body’s tissues.
A new paper published in the journal Science just over a week ago claims to have unravelled how marine mammals can take advantage of the elevated myoglobin concentrations and not get their tissues clogged up by the protein (Mirceta et al, 2013). What the researchers found was that mammalian divers have higher net surface charges on their myoglobin molecules, namely higher positive charges. What this does is cause the myoglobin molecules to stay apart from each other as (remember your high school physics) like charges repel, allowing there to be lots more myoglobin without it clumping together.
But what has this got to do with fossils I hear you ask? This is meant to be a palaeontology blog, not a physiology one! Well this is where an already interesting paper becomes even better. As the relationship between this increased net surface charge of the myoglobin molecules and the increased levels of myoglobin was statistically very robust, this allowed the researchers to use a process called ancestral sequence reconstruction to estimate what the myoglobin sequences of extinct mammals were and therefore estimate their diving capabilities!
There were several interesting results obtained from the ancestral sequence reconstruction, which was conducted for a 130 species phylogeny. It suggests that some extant terrestrial mammals actually may have had an amphibious ancestry. This may not sound immediately intriguing but when you consider that the groups they imply are taxa such as echidnas and moles, both of whom are very well adapted to a fossorial (digging/underground) lifestyle then it really does become more noteworthy. Interestingly, close relatives or even members of both groups (e.g. the platypus and the star nosed mole) still have an amphibious lifestyle. Another group which was found to have an amphibious ancestor was the Paenungulates. This large group contains terrestrial animals such as elephants and hyraxes as well as aquatic taxa such as dugongs, manatees, and the extinct desmostylians. Aquatic ancestry has long been debated for elephants and their kin (known as the Proboscidea) and this study provides evidence for a fossil species of proboscidean possessing a higher net surface charge of its myoglobin, with the modern levels representing a secondary reduction in net surface charge. The authors themselves note that an aquatic ancestry for the hyraxes may seem surprising when current diversity is considered, but there are much larger fossil species for which a semiaquatic lifestyle has been proposed in the past. Another interesting point is that if the common ancestor of the Paenungulates was indeed aquatic, it would represent the earliest placental mammal radiation into the aquatic realm. At an estimated 64 million years ago it would predate the cetaceans and the pinnipeds reinvasion of the water.
Furthermore, by using the relationship between maximum dive time, muscle myoglobin concentration and body mass in extant (living) species, they also estimated maximum dive time in extinct species too (using estimates of body mass for the extinct species). This type of ecological information has been nothing more than an educated guess based on morphology and internal bone structure until now, where Mirceta et al. have constructed a robust model to estimate the dive times of extinct taxa. From their model the team have estimated that one of the earliest known cetaceans, the early Eocene Pakicetus could only hold its breath for 1.6 minutes, whereas by the late Eocene, cetaceans had evolved to the point where Basilosaurus was capable of staying submerged for 17.4 minutes, a figure comparable to modern dolphins. In pinnipeds, the earliest known taxon Enaliarctos has an estimated maximum dive time of 4.7 minutes, which is poor compared to modern seals, perhaps reflecting the fact that it hunted in shallower waters than its modern counterparts? In the proboscideans (the group containing elephants, mammoths, mastodons etc.), the secondary change back to a terrestrial lifestyle (already mentioned above) is reflected in the result that a fossil proboscidean (Moeritherium) had an estimated dive time of 10 minutes, compared to 2.5 minutes in the modern Asian elephant.
This is a really fascinating paper and the best thing about it is that it gives researchers a whole new raft of hypotheses to go away and test. This shows what can be done when a multidisciplinary approach is used in the right way, integrating molecular technologies and fossil data to produce insights that would have been thought impossible previously, giving scientists a new way to think about their fields. Science, you’ve done it again.